A scant two weeks before Thanksgiving 2010, principal Naka Douglas juggles
meetings and works the phones nonstop as he counts down to the opening day of what will soon be the first
all-boys public school in Dallas. “Right now, you are speaking to my entire faculty and staff,” he quips.
By August 2011, the hallways and classrooms of the Barack Obama Male Leadership Academy
at B.F. Darrell will be bustling with 200-plus adolescent boys, sixth through ninth grades. The magnet school — the
students must meet selection criteria — will feature a robotics laboratory, mandatory Latin for middle-grade students,
and electives such as Mandarin Chinese, lacrosse and golf. As the students advance into the upper grades, the school
will expand to eventually teach more than 400 boys through 12th grade.
Single-sex education is not a new concept in the Dallas Independent School District.
A similarly structured girls’ school was launched in 2004. “It has taken six years to happen for our young men,”
Douglas says. “If we can have this type of opportunity for our young ladies, we should be able to do the same for our
young men.”
Boys-only public schools, which didn’t exist a decade ago, are opening their doors
around the country, spawned by a legal shift that dates back to the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) of 2001,
which was signed into law by President George W. Bush in 2002 and became widely known for its testing provisions.
It’s a controversial trend that has resulted in sometimes highly contentious arguments along legal and other lines,
even as the schools continue to proliferate.
Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison from Texas paved the way for public funding for single-sex
schools when she introduced an amendment to the NCLB education act. According to the provision, which garnered some
bipartisan support, including that of then-Sen. Hillary Clinton from New York, public money could be used to finance
various innovative educational initiatives, among them “programs to provide same-gender schools and classrooms.”
In 2006, the U.S. Department of Education issued related regulations to amend components of Title IX — the law that
was designed to guard against sex discrimination in federally assisted educational programs. The regulations
provided more flexibility for single-sex programs while also requiring that they meet a specific educational
objective and provide a “substantially equal” coed alternative. Another key element: The all-boys or all-girls
option must be voluntary. Contact for complete article